Implementation of the order for collection of jointly approved suit money against the defendants in Sections 19 and 22, and the responsibility of the defendant separatist, has been submitted to the security department and all other than the collected memorandum of title deeds. Service charges and costs etc. Property auction by the claimant Mortgage that the sale of the mortgaged property can be recovered only by the memorandum and not beyond that, to accept such request. The court's order passed that the decision was jointly and severally against the two accused had gone. And that the Executive Court had moved beyond the decree by accepting such application as the defendant's obligation to limit the amount of the mortgage in the banking court's observations and such This was not an important decision shown in the memorandum and was justified by the Banking Court limiting the first part of the decision by binding the premises of an important case under which the joint responsibility of both the defendants. Was imposed and many such observations were not only part of the basic order, but also as such There were also hulls. Holder did not appeal such an order, accepting such a request, and the execution court did not go beyond the order and did not commit any illegal activity.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
