Find a Lawyer

KHALIL AHMAD versus STATE

Paragraph 497 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 394 Duty Guarantee, Grant of Further Inquiry Test Identification Parade, absence of accused was not designated in the FIR and additional filed by the complainant. The power of statement was signed in which he did not disclose the source. The accused has been accused of legitimizing information on information related to the accused's involvement in the incident. Someone was behind bars of the prison of progress. The accused was not subjected to any type of test identification parade, though in such cases the accused did not know the victims who were often involved in the robbery cases through additional statements by the victims. After obtaining some information and information from reputable sources themselves and collecting evidence themselves or asking the police to make the case easy for themselves, the accused comes to the domain. Further investigation and reasonable grounds existed to ensure that the accused did not allege bail was allowed in the circumstances

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015

• MUHAMMAD KALEEM KAMRAN v. State 2015 PCrLJ 231
• MUNAS PARVEEN v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE/EX-OFFICIO JUSTICE OF PEACE, SHORKOT 2015 PLD 231
• PUNJAB SEED CORPORATION v. LABOUR COURT NO.9, MULTAN 2015 PLC 232
• MUHAMMAD AMEER QAZI v. MUHAMMAD ASIF ALI 2015 PLD 235
• LASANI BUILDERS v. BOLAN BANK LIMITED 2015 CLD 236
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. State 2015 MLD 242
• HASHIM ASLAM BUTT v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Ministry of Finance 2015 PLD 243
• Ch. SAIFULLAH v. ALI SALEEM 2015 MLD 247

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2015 →

top advocates from Allahabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes