Sections 27, 2 (c), 2 (k) and 33 jurisdiction of the consumer, scope of purchase of consumer property, property and immovable property Invalid order of the Appellant / Defendant Consumer Court under which the defendant responds. The complaint regarding the purchase of the property was settled on the consent of the parties and it was ordered to file the sale proceedings in favor of the complainant. The defendant's opinion was that in the case before the consumer court, There was no jurisdiction, so the consumer must compel the complainant to request court jurisdiction. Or go Qualify to be the first user, and to become a user under the Punjab Consumer Protection Act, 2005. In the present case, it is necessary for a person to be hired from the complaining service provider for any special consideration. He alleged that there was an agreement regarding the purchase of the plots, but the defendant had registered the sale deeds in his favor. Failed to perform. And since the issue of breach of contract which falls under the jurisdiction of the civil court and the consumer court had no jurisdiction in this matter because the real estate dispute cannot be converted into a consumer dispute because Worry is due to non-sale of goods or services. The complainant's case was decided by the consumer court with the consent of all parties, because it was not understandable as the consent of the parties could neither authorize nor be relied upon by a court / tribunal, unless the High Court. Has delayed the order designated under it
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
