MANZOOR AHMED versus 2ND ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, GHOTKI
Under Section 345 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302/147/148/149 of the Qutel Ahmed crime, under the unspecified order under the Scope Trial Court, the offender's legal heirs with the accused facing him Setup allowed. The four defendants were denied trial and denied on the grounds that they were fugitives. The prosecution's point was that under section 24545 (?), the CCPC could only cover the crime when such a crime was being prosecuted and since there was no prosecution. Pending the four fugitives, they could not be compromised, criminal proceedings began when the magistrate took cognizance, and the matter was referred to the competent court so that he could be prosecuted. To sue the heirs. , May also increase the offense against the fugitive spirit behind Section 5 345 (?), CCP is under Islamic law of Ophio and Deraguer, which does not contain any order when the accused agrees to apologize for the prosecution. However, the accused could be pardoned unless the criminal could not be exonerated if the accused did not appear before the accused, the legal heirs of the victim specifically stated that they were allowed to settle. Want to The trial court, along with the present accused, could not refuse the petition against the fugitive, and the result was that an unknown order was set aside and all the accused were acquitted under section 4545 (()). Yes, the CRPC had a review request. Allowed accordingly
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
