Find a Lawyer

SHAHZAD TARIQ versus SECRETARY SCHOOLS (EDUCATION DEPARTMENT) GOVERNMENT OF PNJAB

Article 199 Constitution Petitionability Services Civil Service Transfer Petitioner who served as a Junior Clerk after relocating to Ior G Transfer challenged his transfer to a particular position and question. There was no legal right to post infringement The fundamental right would not be infringed: posting / transfer of the terms and conditions of the public servant and it was the service tribunal that had the exclusive authority to decide and decide on such matters. While in the constitutional jurisdiction, such disputes cannot be requested to be resolved. Mala Fraud also did not authorize the High Court to entertain the constitutional petition to resolve the posting and transfer dispute, as Article 1212 of the Constitution contained an express bar stating that the service tribunal had to interfere. Have exclusive jurisdiction to. Matters like \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• MUHAMMAD SADIQ v. AYAZ MEHMOOD 2012 PLD 273
• JEEWAY PAKISTAN WORKERS UNION through General Secretary v. PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE 2012 PLC 276
• SHAMSHAD BIBI v. DISTRICT JUDGE, MULTAN 2012 YLR 277
• NASIR ALI v. State 2012 MLD 278
• TEHSIL MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, ISA KHEL through Muhammad Yaqoob Khan v. SHAFI ULLAH KHAN 2012 PLC 284
• MUHAMMAD SARWAR v. AHMAD KHAN 2012 CLC 284
• MUHAMMAD TARIQ v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, DUNYAPUR 2012 PCrLJ 285
• Dr. LAL HUSSAIN AKHTAR v. CHIEF SECRETARY PUNJAB 2012 PLC(CS) 286

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

famous lower court advocate from Hafizabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes