Find a Lawyer

TEHSIL MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, ISA KHEL THROUGH MUHAMMAD YAQOOB KHAN versus SHAFI ULLAH KHAN

Article 41 and 55 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Complaint Request Complaint filed by the employee was accepted by the Labor Court, and the Applicant Tribunal did not follow up the matter properly before the employer. Could not be charged, either as a Presiding Officer Labor Court or Appellate Tribunal in favor of the Lawyer and not to initiate departmental proceedings against the Tehsil Municipal Administrator, which is a court testimony by employers before the Labor Court. And presented a profit statement of interest. The Department smells of some mismanagement by Department Officers / Officials Advice for applicants / employers has failed to indicate any misunderstanding or misreading by a forum under which it The High Court's interference in the constitutional jurisdiction can be justified. Constitutional application dismissed

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• JEEWAY PAKISTAN WORKERS UNION through General Secretary v. PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE 2012 PLC 276
• SHAMSHAD BIBI v. DISTRICT JUDGE, MULTAN 2012 YLR 277
• NASIR ALI v. State 2012 MLD 278
• SHAHZAD TARIQ v. SECRETARY SCHOOLS (EDUCATION DEPARTMENT) GOVERNMENT OF PNJAB 2012 PLC(CS) 284
• MUHAMMAD SARWAR v. AHMAD KHAN 2012 CLC 284
• MUHAMMAD TARIQ v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, DUNYAPUR 2012 PCrLJ 285
• Dr. LAL HUSSAIN AKHTAR v. CHIEF SECRETARY PUNJAB 2012 PLC(CS) 286
• TARIQ MASOOD v. DIRECTOR GENERAL, NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU, LAHORE 2012 PLD 287

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

criminal advocate from Bunner lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes