Article 5, Schedule, Sections 13 and 14 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Request for Recovery Allowance, Suits for Recovery Allowance Filed by the Plaintiff Implementing Trial Case, Final Ruling Later, the plaintiffs filed an execution petition, which was allowed pending the petitioner's petitioner, who was the father of the verdict's decision, pending a lengthy period because of the delay strategy, petitioner 10,000 Paid Rs and asked to pay the remaining amount in case the decision was not paid by the debtor. Later, the decision maker was eventually arrested for failing to pay the judgment amount or by the applicant / bailor. The petition was filed for the expulsion of the bailor / bail from the petitioner, the Family Court and the Court of Appeal bail were disputed. The dispute was that he was not the arbitrator and was merely responsible for the decision. On the arrest of the accused, there could be no further proceedings against the arrest of the accused, when he performed his duty by appearing before the court, the applicant was misunderstood as the applicant appeared in the judgment. Was not guaranteed to happen. The borrower, but he is guaranteed to pay the sum of money, cannot be relieved of his liability because of the arrest of the judgment debtor. Disapproved orders passed under the petition by Family Court and Appellate Court were rejected \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
