Section 12 suits for the specific performance of the sale contract claiming that the second contract is forged by the plaintiff's suit 2/2 years after the plaintiff's second contract data and forfeited. The defendant's claim in defendant's claim prematurely claimed that he did not receive a substantial amount from the plaintiff, therefore, the sale agreement was canceled; and that he had transferred the suit land through his general attorney. The source was transferred to the other vendor after the vendor claimed that the plaintiff's evidence had found the whole sale case, the vendor refused to resign or refused to enforce the contract in favor of it. It was The minor contractor, the second contractor, and the vendor's general attorney, in their statements, confirmed the vendor's cancellation and, on the direction of the attorney general of the second contract vendor Marginal Gorton, other vendor Patwari changed their arguments. I switched to another seller. General Power of Attorney on the basis of which his lawyer entered into the exchange in favor of the other vendor. The other vendor, through trustworthy evidence, signed the contract with the vendor in favor of the second contract from time to time. The first was and in its performance the second vendor was taken over. In his suit for a permanent injunction the other shopkeeper is broken and the injunction against the shopkeeper and the plaintiff, and the plaintiff had stated before the court that he relinquished the burden of the plaintiff to prove the second contract. And another fraudulent person
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
