Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SOHAIL SARWAR versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KHANEWAL

Article 9 (1) (2) and 16 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Appeal Reviewed before the Arbitration Council on the Limitation of the Friday, the Assistant Collector removed the amendment filed by her husband, in which section 9 (2) of the Muslim Family Rules ) Is allowed to submit revisions. The ordinance, 1961, was 30 days after the husband filed an amendment without limitation request for a delay, but the assistant collector of the arbitration rightly dismissed the arbitration council's action even before the husband knew. It did not enter a revision within the time limit. The constitutional request was dismissed

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015

• SHAMIL BANK OF BAHRAIN E.C. v. Mian AYAZ ANWAR 2015 CLD 893
• GHULAM HAIDER v. State 2015 YLR 898
• MUHAMMAD ANWAR v. NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN, Sialkot 2015 PLC(CS) 903
• WAQAR AHMAD v. State 2015 PCrLJ 904
• Miss ASMA JAVAID v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Health Department 2015 CLC 907
• MCB BANK LTD. v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE 2015 PTD 911
• SAEED AHMED SHERAZI v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB 2015 PLC(CS) 915
• SARWAR KHAN alias LALA v. State 2015 MLD 921

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2015 →

immigration advocate from Wazirabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes