In section 2?2 (b) and Q 34 of the trial, the conviction for appreciation of the joint intention evidence, the reduction of the FIR immediately after filing the FIR, excluded the possibility of the defendant's immunity, based on the evidence of the witnesses. The source had a case against the accused, cross-examined at length, but his evidence could not be shaken during the investigation. It was said that the witnesses were quite natural, reliable and trustworthy, with medical evidence fully supported by being a full-fledged suspect, making it impossible for the witnesses to release the original culprit and to have a close relative. The accused will be falsely involved in the murder, as in such cases the complainant and other eyewitnesses who were close relatives of the deceased had explained their presence on the spot. Their evidence cannot be dismissed merely on the point of view of the medical evidence; medical evidence fully supported the ocular account presented by the prosecution's witnesses; The pistol, which was dispatched to Franzic together with the science laboratory, could not be ruled out for the preparation of the crime before sending it to the laboratory. The defendant's request for defense in this case was not an ambiguous statement. It was available in favor of the accused that the possession of the accused had been denied the possession of a pistol. That it was a single firearm case, and was not charged for the recurrence of the fireworks injury. That the evidence of litigation was not infidelity. This partner
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
