Section 3/5 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 265 K Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Appeal The accused applicant filed a complaint under section 3 and 5 in the private complaint filed by the complainant under section 265, An application was filed under CRPC. The trial court of the Illegal Settlement Act, 2005, dismissed the said application solely because all the points raised by the accused applicant required proof. It is said that there is no compelling reason for excluding the decision. The verdict or ruling is a must, so that its reader clearly understands the reason for approving it, so that the judicial or judicial capacity or its Even in the executive capacity, every order passed under the provisions of any law should have reasons and there should be objections to the reasons. The reason for the expression is not specified in any of the laws, but generally the expression refers to an action or order approved by the PK. The appropriate reason for the trial court should be to take into account all the points raised during the argument and then at each point after giving the correct reason for the same disapproval order, according to the requirement of reasonable reasoning by Emerson, the office or authority. Should have decided. In light of the above observations, a remand was obtained in the trial court for the judgment to be filed under the CCPC, section 65K, according to which the constitutional application was accepted.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
