A II, R 2 and O VI, R 17 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 12 Suites for the specific performance of the sale contract Separation from a portion of the suit land by the vendor, later filed by the plaintiff His application was revoked after the trial, for a trial to be deemed illegal and unnecessary for the rights of the plaintiff in favor of an application for modification. After that, the proposed amendment sought against the seller will not change the nature and color of the suit, without questioning the sincerity of the sale, but rather to determine the actual dispute between the parties. It was also necessary that in the event of refusal of the proposed amendment, the plaintiff would be terminated with junk money. O II, R 2, CPC will later question the legal status of Wile in favor of the seller, and the proposed amendment is not sufficient to reject the trial court unless the passing order has a scope established in it. Failure to exercise the option, the High Court rejected the impugned order and in the circumstances accepted such request.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
