ADMINISTRATOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MULTAN versus HAIDER ZAMAN QURESHI
Arts 72, 117 and 120 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), section 42 suit for declaration of title document, proof of ounce for non-objection has not been decided by the plaintiff claiming compensation to the municipal corporation And built a building on the leased corporation. The plaintiff's position was denied as compensation and the plaintiff's original documents presented by the trial court and the lower appellate court were objected and pleaded in favor of the plaintiff. The plaintiff corporation objected to the preparation of the documents in favor of the plaintiff but the trial court did not object to the decision. The documents cannot be relied upon without the decision of the plaintiff corporation's objection, the plaintiff claimed that he was respected in the contract and the defendant denied the existence of the corporation's documents and claimed It is a forged and forged document and thus it was necessary for the claimant to prove the contract of the document. The documents related to the law were not proved and since both the courts suffered such misreading and non-reading of the record, both documents. Depending on which the two courts below were caught up in error, which review The use of Ni jurisdiction did not prove to the High Court. And the orders passed by the two courts below, consequently dismissing the case filed by the plaintiff, were allowed to be revised in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
