Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ISMAIL versus STATE

Section 2 302 (b) Definition of Nature Definition of Evidence The accused was designated with a special role in the FIR immediately recorded, appeared in the light of day, in the light of the incident, eyewitnesses said. Details of the incident were recovered on the suspects' report. Human blood-stained accused and the deceased brother were accused. In their statement under Section 2342, the CCP acknowledged that the victim's murder was committed in the house of the complainant, the accused controlling five persons. His body was brutally murdered. The person suffered injuries and did not deserve any relaxation. Partial compromise and relations between the parties can hardly be considered to reduce the punishment.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• Syed SAQLAIN ABBAS v. Syed HAYAT SHAH 2012 CLC 945
• MUHAMMAD AKHTAR KIANI v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, RAWALPINDI 2012 YLR 945
• ADMINISTRATOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MULTAN v. HAIDER ZAMAN QURESHI 2012 MLD 948
• TANVEER HUSSAIN v. DIRECTOR, AGRICULTURE (ECONOMICS AND MARKETING), PUNJAB, LAHORE 2012 PLC(CS) 948
• JAVAED AKHTAR v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary Agriculture, Lahore 2012 PLC(CS) 956
• BANK OF PUNJAB through Authorised Officer v. KNK INFRASTRUCTURE (PVT.) LTD. 2012 CLD 961
• IMRAN ASHRAF v. Mst. AYESHA ARSHAD 2012 MLD 961
• COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LEGAL DIVISION, BAHAWALPUR v. ZULFIQAR ALI 2012 PTD 964

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

lawer from fb area from Mangi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes