Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD GULZAR versus ADALAT HUSSAIN

Sections 7 33 (f), 7 iv f (iv) and Cri 34 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), section 417 filed against Geifah (asthma), the prosecution appealed to the radiologist to prove the nature of the evidence. Because of the injuries and thus it was not legally proven that the accused had already spent more than ten years in jail and in this case, too much water flowed under the bridge and under the circumstances. The imprisonment was impossible to reverse the order of acquittal In the following the court order failed to identify any misunderstanding, illegal and wrong, appeal against his evil Excluded

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• MUHAMMAD MURRAD v. State 2012 YLR 1309
• Mst. SAIMA BIBI v. S.H.O., POLICE STATION TAMMAN 2012 YLR 1313
• YASIR CHAUDHRY v. State 2012 MLD 1315
• SANAULLAH v. State 2012 YLR 1315
• RAFIQ AHMAD v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1321
• ALLIED BANK LIMITED through Tariq Mehmood Sheikh SAM and Mujtaba Gillani AVP-SAM v. SHAHABAD TEXTILES (PVT.) LTD. 2012 CLC 1326
• IRFAN UL HAQ v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1328
• MUNAWAR HUSSAIN v. State 2012 MLD 1330

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

best advocate from Talagang lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes