MEHMOOD AKHTAR MAQBOOL versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Sections 15, 21 (1) and 22 (6) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application for tenants to withdraw leave for leave to contest, the tenant moved the application for leave after a period of ten days. What was rejected was the limitation of the tenants that no notice was issued under section 21 (1) of the Punjab Rated Premises Ordinance, 2007, and this notice should not only be in fixed form but At the same time, a copy of the application and documents should be made competent. The eviction request was simultaneously accepted by the tenant to apply for leave within 10 days. The Wallet Rental Tribunal rejected the request for leave so that the tenant neither challenged the said order at the relevant time nor had the final order been approved in order to defend it beyond the statutory period of limitation. Against this, the tenant had accordingly raised no objection to his non-service in the appeal, in the constitutional application of the provisions of section 21 (1) of the Punjab Rented Premises Ordinance, 2007, for the first time, Cannot be allowed, after four years and nine months after the final pass, the tenant was banned from raising such an objection. The tenant tribunal was obliged to pass the final order in the event of the applicant not applying for leave for defense by the tenant and was retained by the appellate court directly through the appellate court, in which case Illegal or irregularities were not identified. Missing constitutional petition in unconstitutional orders
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
