Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), section 324/148/149 attempted murder conviction, felony armed assault, unlawful assembly guarantee, grant of further investigation, and the shooting of the accused. Charged. The complaining party alleged that the accused and the accomplices were engaged in fraud and the complaining party refused to pay them. The accused was punished because of his previous enmity and his co-accused. He had a relationship with someone. That he was a schoolteacher. Because of this the injury was naturally common and did not repeat the firearm, and that the police said that the accused did not cause any fire or injury to the injured person, although it was alleged that he opened fire on the injured. But he didn't say it again. No fracture was found due to the firearm allegedly fired by the accused, who belonged to a co-accused, who was the culprit of the incident. Police learned that the accused was present on the spot. But he did not cause any injuries to the injured. Although the suspect disappeared after the incident, it was customary for the police to avoid hand fraud in such a way that no refusal was imposed on the accused's refusal to bail, unless a case of bail was presented. The release of the accused on the bail, which was not disabled by the conviction of the accused, was one of the investigations of the case and accordingly the accused was released on bail.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
