Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

KABEZ MONDAL versus STATE


Article (58 ()) Special leave of appeal against the order of hearing of the imprisonment applicants to complete sentence, irrational and dismissal request.

1970 S C M R 884

Present : Hamoodur Rahman, C. J. and M. R. Khan, J

KABEZ MONDAL AND 7 OTHERS‑Petitioners

versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 75‑D of 1969, decided on 15th June 1970.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the 1Jigh Court of East Pakistan, Dacca, dated the 5th June 1969, in Criminal Revision No. 457 of 1968).

Constitution of Pakistan (1962),

Art. 58(3)‑Petition for Special Leave to Appeal against orders of imprisonment‑ petitioners having served out full sentences, petition in fructuous and dismissed.

M. A. Khaled, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.

Nemo for the State.

Date of hearing : 15th June 1970.

ORDER

HAMOODUR RAHMAN, C. J.

‑The petitioners were tried and. convicted under section 411 of Pakistan Penal Code and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for two years each. This was affirmed in appeal by the Sessions Judge. A revision against this in the Nigh Court, however, succeeded in part, as the conviction was upheld but the sentence was reduced from two years to one year's rigorous imprisonment only.

This order was passed on the 5th of June 1969, and the petitioners filed a petition for special leave to appeal in this Court on the 6th August 1969. An application for bail was put in along with the petition but bail was refused on the 7th August 1969. The petition has now come up for hearing but the learned counsel states that it has become in fructuous since the petitioners have served out their full sentences. He does not, accordingly, wish to press the petition. The petition is dismissed as having become in fructuous.

Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates from Musafir Khana lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.