Section 497 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Articles 392 and 411 robbery, theft of property for dishonesty, denying the allegation against the accused was that he accompanied his accomplices to the complainant's house at the gunpoint. Of the robbery and took away various belongings. The articles accompanying them were not named in the FIR, but were named through the complainant's supplementary statement, which clearly stated that he had accidentally told the accused his / her fellow accused. Looked at a restaurant with, and to find out the address of both. He immediately disclosed in police records a report that the accused was an ordinary offender and five other criminal cases were registered against him, allegedly cash, mobile phones and other articles on the accused's offer. Were recovered. Failing to falsely implicate any of the complainant's unlawful desires or enmity in this case, the ICP 392, PPC, which falls under the prohibition clause of section 497, CCPC on the record the accused accused The attachment was available on record The defendant's bail application was dismissed, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
