MUHAMMAD SALEEM NAWAZ versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, CHISTIAN
Section 8, 9 (b), 19 (4), 22 (3) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Request for Discharge, Non-Compliance with Sections 8, 9 (b), 19 (4) and 22 (3) The petition was granted by the rental tribunal to exclude the impugned landlord (Landlord) of the Punjab Rated Premises Ordinance, 2007, and the appellate court petitioner (the tenant) was suspended in this constitutional petition on the ground that The dismissal request was not credible in view of the law filed by the landlord Before filing the eviction petition, it was the responsibility of the landlord to provide tenancy to the Punjab Rented Premises Ordinance, 2007. Submitted 10 per cent or provisions. Punjab Rented Premises for submission of affidavits and affidavits of two witnesses, with the penalty of the annual cost of rent of premises fixed under Sections 8 and 9 (b) of the Punjab Rated Premises Ordinance 2007 and the request for eviction under s. Owners of Action 19 (4) of the Ordinance, 2007, admitted that they had not met such requirements under sections 8, 9 (b) and 19 (4) of the Ordinance before filing a withdrawal application. Show no reasonable cause or reasonably reasonable explanation for not submitting such affidavits in support of the eviction request before the Rent Tribunal and not submitting a 10% penalty on the annual cost of rent under section 19 (4). Done. The ordinance establishes the principle of law that when a law is required to do something in a particular way, it must do so accordingly and if the proposed procedure is not followed, the idea It will be said that this law was not made in accordance with departure. Appropriate with the explicit method of law
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
