Find a Lawyer

NOOR AHMAD versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF

The trial court dismissed the trial court's pre-emptive litigation not mentioning the location and location of the trial case, but the lower appellate court filed an additional case relating to Tall's performance and then the case. Trial is set to go to trial court to decide. Recent Assessment If the matter was sent to the trial court for the purpose of defining the matter with regard to Talb's performance, no useful purpose would be obtained as the performance of the victim was not proved by the plaintiff nor by an earlier umpire. Reflects on the evidence presented. The case had to be dismissed and the trial court correctly performed the High Court, the decision and decree of the lower appellate court were set aside by the use of the amended jurisdiction and the trial was restored to trial. had gone.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• CHIEF COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, MULTAN v. MUHAMMAD BILAL 2012 PLC(CS) 112
• ABDUL MAJEED v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary to Government of Pakistan 2012 PLD 112
• M. SHARIF v. S.H.O. 2012 MLD 114
• YAR MUHAMMAD KHAN v. SAJJAD ABBAS 2012 PLD 115
• MUSTAFA v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE 2012 PCrLJ 117
• SHABBIR v. State 2012 MLD 120
• SOHAIL RIAZ v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary Education 2012 PLD 121
• QASIM ALI MALIK v. State 2012 PCrLJ 124

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

law websites from Nilam lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes