O XVI, R 1 and O XVIII, Rr 2, 3, 4 Production of witnesses for specific performance of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 12 suit agreement, whose name was not included in the list of witnesses After recording the statements of the two witnesses, the matter was settled for the remaining evidence that the plaintiff presented another person as the third witness's defendant raised the objection that the name of the person was not included in the witness list. Therefore, his statement could not be recorded. After comparing the provisions of O XVI, R1 and O XVIII, Rr 2, 3, the appellate court denied that the witness would have to make a witness between the conditional call and the hearing by the court process. ? , In the presence of the CPC witness can be examined according to the provisions of O XVIII, RR 2 and 4, the defendant's CPC objection was misunderstood, in which case the appellate court dismissed the objection. I did not refuse on behalf of the defendants to commit any illegal activity or irregularities which sought intervention by the High Court amendment.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
