Find a Lawyer

ZULFIQAR ALI versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Conviction Bail, Further Investigation FIR grant shows that the accused was present on the spot empty-handed and the victim or any other person of any kind. No injuries. The prosecution's testimony was solely attributed to the defendant's larceny and was not yet established, whether the original attacker worked independently or worked under the suspect at the time of the commission of the previous offense. The alleged motive raised by the complaining party was not disputed by any evidence but the complainant's dispute regarding joint intent or vicarious liability was still to be established during the evidence when the accused sought further investigation of his crime. The accused was charged with a charge of murder but with no evidence from the prosecution. He's not in charge. 65 years and under such circumstances he could not be denied bail because the accused's plea bail was accepted in the case of punishment and ND was granted bail.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012

• IQBAL HUSSAIN SHAH v. State 2012 PCrLJ 848
• SHAHID AKHTAR v. SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE 2012 PLC(CS) 851
• GHULAM HUSSAIN v. MUHAMMAD AHSAN 2012 MLD 852
• MUHAMMAD TAJ v. ALI AKHTAR 2012 CLC 853
• SUGRA v. IMAM KHAN 2012 CLC 856
• CHOLISTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. JAMAL KHAN 2012 MLD 859
• Mrs. KAUSAR A. GHAFFAR v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, CIVIL SECRETARIAT, LAHORE 2012 PLC(CS) 861
• MUHAMMAD ASIF v. State 2012 YLR 867

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2012 →

advocate from Theing Jattan More lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes