AUJLA AND ASSOCIATES THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTION versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, GUJRANWALA
Sections 5 and 13 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Article VII of the O VII & O VI R 2 Constitution of Pakistan Pre-emption Suite Talks, Plaintiff's Company's Scope Plant Performance under Order VII, R 11, CPC Was rejected. The premise that the company's chief executive had not recorded a permit to correct the required tolls under O VI, Rule 2, CPC was not necessary for litigation to file the nature of the evidence. The process by which the request was made was to prove it, for which it was necessary to practice the preparation of evidence at the appropriate stage in accordance with the law, to deny the investigation, the contents had to be believed and the process to begin. Only after that, the plaintiff may be sued if the cause of action is not disclosed is the plaintiff's chief executive specifically charged with the performance of the litigation. It was objected that the chief executive was not authorized to make the necessary talks. In addition to the plaintiff's written statement of the Petitioner Company, it was not appropriate that it could not be justified on the basis that at the time of setting up the case, the student was not authorized to make the record because of the fact that the evidence at the appropriate stage. The plaintiff's company's dismissal order dismissing the case was set aside, in which case, a constitutional application was allowed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2012
