Sections 302 (b), 224, 353, 396, 148 and 149 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 7 (a) (h) and 21L of Kotal, resistance or legal arrest by a person FIR was filed approximately six-and-a-half hours after the FIR was lodged with criminal force, murder, mischief, general mobilization, terrorist activity, fraudulent evidence to prevent an attacker or a public servant from performing his duties. The accused was declared to be a special character in creating an account, nor can it be assumed that the police had fired at the police party during the encounter, a prosecution witness confirmed. By no means, did Deak reveal that the suspect had any connection with the car's riders. An eyewitness, who opened fire on the prisoner's van, did not claim that he continued the alleged shootings between the parties for about 1/2 hour, but the investigating officer said Failed to collect an empty case of crime from. The location of the police story of the incident, as described by the eyewitnesses, did not disclose that the Acculer account linked to the suspect killed in the encounter did not link the accused to the commission of the crime or that the same charge could not be relied upon. Could not be relied upon to maintain the sentence. Recovering all official machine guns / rifles and 30 bore five pistols from the scene of the incident, rarely associate the suspect with the commission of the crime, as it was not sent to the forensic science office. The laboratory for comparison here and on both sides found dead bodies, the accused had no fault of the prosecution prove all the charges against the accused
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
