The testimony of the evidence was absent from Article 2 (2 (b) and Q 34) in the case with excellent, common intention, which occurred at 00 am in the month of December, and the complainant was not a witness to the incident. The statement did not name any of its accused. The individual statement filed an FIR on the basis of which the complainant recorded his supplementary statement, in which he based the information provided by a prosecutor's witness. The suspects were hanged, who were given both witnesses to the vandalism, the village, where the incidents took place, but they were residents of other villages and on the occasion, Could not give a complimentary reason for the existence of the evidence. It was not safe to rely on the evidence presented by the plaintiff. There was no evidence of additional judicial confession against one of the defendants, however, the prosecution did not, Evidence of extra-judicial confession was presented against the other two accused - were the witnesses of the resident prosecutor of different villages who were told that the accused had allegedly committed extra-judicial confession; The evidence for extra-judicial confessions was a proof of a weak kind, and in the present case it is plausible. No, it can't be trusted. The prosecution alleged that no evidence could be found that the incident was anonymous, and no details about the crime in which the crime was committed were disclosed through additional court admissions testimony, medical evidence. There was no need to discuss, no science of forensic science. The allegedly recovered cocaine pump operation from the lab
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
