Section 9 (c) Definition of Drug Arrest and Smuggling Evidence Benefits of Doubts Failure to Exhibit Recovery Memo on Record of Delay in Sampling of Witness Statements Recorded by the Court of Criminal Appeal Under Section 9 (c) Was declared. , 1997 Legal prosecution witnesses contradicted each other on the material aspects of the case The FIR stated that the bus was brought to the police station where it was searched and allegedly from its secret caves. The drugs were recovered, but the investigating officer said the local police had already searched. Before the police station complainants (SHOs) were brought in, he negated the contents of his report in his investigation, saying that he had detected a prohibition on the motorway and searched it. The vehicle was taken to the police station. The bus question B was under investigation, but the investigating officer stated that the bus was traveling M \ K \ K \ from the place. The investigating officer admitted that in the two site plans he had prepared, he had not shown the presence of the appellants, and that the serious witnesses had recovered the memorandum in their statements under section 161. , The CCP neither disclosed the names of the appellants nor did they show the right to arrest, the prosecution's witness stated, that there was no mention of appellant's arrest in the recovery memo and that he had disclosed his ignorance. Whether the bus was searched on the spot or not. Whether or not the complainant (SHO) admitted that nothing was recovered from the immediate possession of the appellants nor of the appellants.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
