THE STATE THROUGH PROSECUTOR-GENERAL ACCOUNTABILITY versus ZAKIR ULLAH
Sections 9, 10 and 32 Appeal evidence against acquittal of allegations of corruption and corruption doubt The benefit of doubt doubt The allegation against the defendant (defendant) was that he had transferred immovable and immovable assets to his name and property during his employment. In the name of dependency, dependency. And Beniamaros, who was disputed by his well-known sources of income, the trial court acquitted the accused of the allegations leveled against him, the accuracy trial court presented its evidence in its original context and the benefit of the doubt to the accused. Was extended, which was supported on content. The record trial court dealt with the matter in a fair and reasonable manner. The evidence was not misinterpreted or committed illegal or irregular, and every document was cited on the record and it was lawfully discussed and concluded fairly that the trial court's bail order was not breached. Was neither illegal nor guaranteed to interfere, accordingly excluded
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
