Find a Lawyer

BASHIR versus MUHAMMAD SALEEM

Section 497 (2) Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Assassination Bail, Further Investigation Grant No witnesses to this incident were in the record No defamatory articles or weapons were recovered from the accused last time. The witness witness was mentioned in the FIR by the complainant, who was later presented as the accused in the case. No motive was imposed against the accused site plan, not mentioning the witness who identified the incident at different locations of the suspects. Co was enlarged on bail of the accused and the accused's case was equal, co-accused had grounds to further investigate the matter, and was accused of consistency bail conditions

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012

• MUHAMMAD RASOOL v. ASLAM KHAN 2012 CLC 637
• FAZAL WAHAB v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PESHAWAR 2012 PTD 645
• SALIMULLAH v. NOOR ALI 2012 MLD 651
• NOOR KAMAL KHAN v. MIR GHULAM 2012 MLD 657
• JEHANGIR ALAM v. State 2012 MLD 667
• Mst. HEEMAT JEHAN v. ATTAULLAH SHAH 2012 CLC 686
• AHMED YAR v. GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Chief Secretary, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 2012 PLC(CS) 693
• COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE, PESHAWAR v. LUCKY CEMENT LIMITED, PESHAWAR 2012 PTD 708

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2012 →

list of advocates from Kotla Pathan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes