Section 2 (b) / 4 324/7 337 D / 7 337 F (I) A conviction for attempted murder, which is appreciating weak and costly evidence, reduced the reporting of this incident within two hours. At any time, under the circumstances recorded by the complainant, the complainant and the other were not taken for the advice or counsel of the injured and invasive witnesses and another eyewitness witness, the material points were consistent, located. The presence of all witnesses was established at the time of their occurrence. They dismissed the ocular testimony and supported the prosecution's version, and no evidence could be produced. He remained steadfast and his fact was not disputed, as the medical evidence confirmed the testimony of the prosecution's witnesses. At the hands of the accused, in these circumstances, he confessed to the complainant besides being injured. And even passer-by for the accused, whose suspect was injured during the incident, had no power because there was no concrete evidence available. Revealed when it was due to the aftermath of the defensive action, hardly available to the accused, under these circumstances Saha had fully established the culprit of the accused, who was accused of shooting the victim. And revenge was an unusual occurrence because of the injuries to two people. It was not possible that the close relatives of the victim would have allowed the original offender to release Scott and substitute the commission of a crime related to the death sentence of an innocent person, in which case, the actual sentence was awarded. Neither did the previous enmity between the parties
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
