Section 44 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), declaration of suits Articles 42 and 54 and proof of title of property for injunctive injunction against the plaintiff on the request of the defendant to defraud the trial suit The trial court dismissed, but the lower appellate court ruled that individual entries in favor of the plaintiff could not be given any right or title in favor of the defendants, for the purpose of maintaining such record of income. And if any entry is shown to be invalid and in violation of the law, the property of such variation Defendants failed to prove that the sale consideration was paid to the plaintiff, therefore, there was no sale of the suit property in the eyes of the law when the original order was without legal authority, Then the entire super structure was bound to fall to the ground. After its cancellation, the subsequent transfer based on the controversial mutation, would result in such changes at the entire surface. Subsequently, the transfer defendants can take no advantage in the fraudulent proceedings. The lower appellate court properly adhered to the evidence and law on the subject and reached a reasonable and legal solution, ruling the plaintiff's case, any material illegal material or material irregularities in the lower appellate court's decision. Was found to have sought and amended the High Court's interference with the exercise of jurisdiction over the review.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
