Section Q Qun Qanun Martyrdom (1984 (of (Ten))) Article 4 134 Doctorate Documents of Criminal Condition Documents Documents Proving Age Scope The trial court convicted and sentenced the Omar Scope accused and co-accused (defendants) After which they filed an appeal against his conviction. Re-filed in trial court for, De Novo Complainant (Applicant) filed the petition before the trial court granted the radiologist as a judicial witness The petitioner sought to testify about the report prepared by him, on the basis of which the age of the accused and the co-accused was determined by the doctors, but he said that the applicants were convicted by the trial court. Was rejected by the trial court in his absence, as well as his lawyer, who passed an unreasonable order. He was never presented during his trial and, as he wrongly declared him a minor, The validity of the record reveals that the accused and the accused were earlier tried by the trial court, in which they did not accept their tender age request nor did they go to trial in the general court. Objected to. The requirement of the law was that the accused take such a request at the earliest stage, following the registration of the case. , So that the investigating officer gathers evidence in support of the suspect and the co-accused
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
