Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD UMAR SAEED versus GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN


Article 177 (1) (b) specifies the appeal of the Supreme Court to consider whether the charge was dismissed without notice on any other showcasing notice on the person identified and his dismissal of the offender. Holidays

1969 S C M R 140

Present: Fazle‑Akbar, C. J. anal Abdus Sattar, J

MUHAMMAD UMAR SAEED‑Petitioner

versus

GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 232 of 1968, decided on 7th November 1968.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore, dated the .12th March 1968, in Writ Petition No. 35/S of 1968).

Constitution of Pakistan (1962)

---

Art. 177 (1) (b) Person charge‑sheeted and on his plea of guilty dismissed from service Whether dismissal proper without a second show‑cause notice Special Leave to Appeal granted by Supreme Court to consider question.

Khan Nemat Khan, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by S. Abdul Karim, Attorney for Petitioner.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 7th November 1968.

ORDER

FAZLE‑AKBAR, C. J.‑

The petitioner, Muhammad Umar Saeed, was a Junior Clerk in the office of the District Health Officer, Muzaffargarh. An Audit Party, on checking the cash book of the office, found :‑

(a) that some missing entries had been made up ;

(b) that the remarks recorded by the Director, Health Services had been erased from the cash book, and

(c) that an excess amount of Rs..4,402.84 was paid to one, Manzoor Baig, a Male Nurse, as arrears .of salary.

He was charge‑sheeted and on his plea of guilty he was dismissed from service with effect from 15th October 1965, by the Senior Assistant Director, Health Directorate, Sargodha Region, Multan. He then moved a writ in the High Court against the said order, but the same was dismissed. He now seeks special leave to appeal to this Court.

The learned counsel has challenged the order of dismissal on the ground that no second show‑cause notice was issued to him before the final order of dismissal, as required under Article 177 (i) (b) of the Constitution as well as under rule 9 of the West Pakistan Government Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1960.

We think this point requires consideration. We, accordingly grant leave .to appeal to consider the above point only. Security Rs. 1,000.

Leave granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
pakistani advocates Rawala Kot lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.