MUHAMMAD ASIF CHATHA versus CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE
Section 8 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Punjab Civil Servants (Appointment and Terms of Service) Rules, 1974, R13, promoted by BBC Engineering Appellants, initially in 1995 1998 Was gone The positions of Assistant Engineers in BS 17 were based on depravity, while the respondents were promoted in 2001 that on a regular basis the appellants challenged such advertisement of the respondents in the constitutional petition and the High Court authorized authority. Was instructed to decide the dispute according to the law. After hearing the parties, the Supreme Court upheld the order of the High Court and demanded the competent authority and the competent authority to seek its remand. Appeals were declared promoted as regular progress from the date of their publicity. , The order of the competent authority was withheld by the respondents before the service tribunal. And the tribunal leaves the authority with the decree, demanding a fresh hearing for the resolution of the dispute. The Competent Authority has ruled that there is no basis for considering the regular progress of the appeals and considering regularly promoting the appeals. Cannot be done because the appellants filed appeals before the Tribunal from 1995 to 2002. Three seniority listings were issued and the appeals were never challenged; the promotion of the appeals was not challenged on the basis of the provisions contained in R13 of the Punjab Civil Servant (1974 Appointment and Terms of Service) Rules, 1974 Unless they are regularized by appropriate channels. , Appellants cannot be considered to be promoted on a permanent basis, Punjab Civil
