SHAFIQUE AHMAD CHAUDHRY versus CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE
The appellants serving as store keepers, imposing penalties of sections 3, 5, 6 and 10, proceeded against the department for mismanagement and negligence in the discharge of duties (special powers) from Punjab. Appeals were alleged that during the financial year they spent too much without any legal authority and proper control / check, which led to the formation of the Investigation Committee on Misconduct from time to time. Upon completion, he submitted his report and recommended that appellants be punished. The penalty for the loss of 1/8 recovery of the loss as well as the reduction in the pay scale early, despite the fact that any appellant has to pay for either the work of excavation, the operation of the excavation machine, quality testing and purchase quantity. Was not deposed for. The material appellant's job was simply to enter the material purchased in G. The oods receipt sheet, as well as the stock register, was the job of storekeepers to purchase spare parts, without heavy and excessive expenses, without legal authority during the contentious fiscal year. Nor did the appellants buy without requiring tenders, but the Inquiry Committee neither authorized the inquiry committee nor the competent authority, as the competent authority declared the appellants to be falsely accused. Consider a clear error in any evidence regarding this assertion The department's representative and deputy district attorney acknowledged that the evidence was executive engineer on the question of financial loss to the public exchequer
