MAJOR MUHAMMAD KHALID KARIM versus MST. SAADIA YAQUB
Sections 5 and 7 (2), Second Law [Family Courts (Amendment) Ordinance (incorporated by LV of 2002)] The Gardens and Wards Act (VII of 1890), Sections 9 (1), 12 and 25 minor territorial jurisdiction. Detention of the Minor Minors permanently resided with his father at M and his mother filed a petition with the Guardian Judge requesting his custody. The Lower Appellate Court, along with El Guardian Judge. It has also taken the stand that there is a territorial jurisdiction over M issues in place but the High Court declared that the action was initiated by the mother of the minor, El had the ability to maintain the place. The minor lived with his father, where he was admitted to the school. The mother failed to prove that they had brought her to the place and had been arrested. They were deprived there, which could have led to action in their favor. L had not been established, if before separation, the parties were living here in L so that the West Pakistan would have been killed by FKR 6. (B) be attracted to The rules of the National Courts, 1965 High Court were erroneous while the Supreme Court, while declaring the case as permissible, put aside the High Court's decision and allowed the appeals of the Guardian Judge and the Lower Appellate Court. Was given
