PAKISTAN HINDU COUNCIL versus PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF LAW
Articles 184 (3) of the Constitution and Article 184 (3) of the Constitution demanded that a new law be enforced against the freedom to forcibly confess one religion to another. Had filed the current constitutional petition with the claim that in order to protect and enforce the fundamental rights of citizens, the court could instruct the Supreme Government to enforce a law that states that this person is A person trying to convert or change a religion from one religion to another may be punished with imprisonment. By virtue of Article 20 of the Constitution, whether by force, acquisition or fraud or any such change assisted or restored, no specific legislation was required, as each The citizen had a fundamental right to claim, practice and preach. Its Religion The Supreme Court observed that where a forced religion was to be changed, the law always took its own path to the Constitution The Eternal Petition was dealt with accordingly.
