MUHAMMAD AZHAR SIDDIQUI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Articles 63 (2), 63 (1) (G), 204 (2), 175 (2) and 184 (3) of the contempt of court Ordinance (V 2003), sections 3 and 5 of Article 184 (3) of the Constitution Under the constitution, the Speaker of the National Assembly challenged the decision by which he refused to send reference to the Election Commission against the Prime Minister on the basis of his competence by the Supreme Court in the contempt of court case. The question regarding the disqualification of the Prime Minister's Speaker from the Supreme Court, the National Assembly, in such a case was the debate on the applicant's scope, after the Prime Minister's sentence, the speaker was obliged to hand over the matter to the election. Was. The Commission for the issuance of a notification of the Prime Minister's disqualification, and that the Speaker was not legally allowed to sit on a decision on a matter, which ultimately led to the decision by the Supreme Court. The verdict was pronounced. The Prime Minister was that the Speaker had the power and authority to decide the Prime Minister's disqualification by applying himself freely because he was not merely a post office. That Article 63 (1) (g) of the Constitution had nothing to do with the automatic application of the name, and that the Supreme Court had no role in the matters to be decided by the Speaker of the National Assembly or, finally, the Election Commission. Accuracy The Prime Minister was read under Article 204 (2) of the Supreme Court, with contempt of court Ordinance, Section 3 of 2003, guilty of intentionally breaking, disobeying and disobeying the Supreme Court's direction. Was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment. Minister of the Court, which was to pass through them regularly, the Minister
