Sections 302, 324, 398 and 34 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (v. 1898), section 161 Qutel-e-Adham, attempted murder day, committing robbery or robbery, when equipped with deadly weapons, combined with acts of multiple persons. Definition of Evidence of Intentional Damage Correction Impact Co-ordination Scope / Principle The deceased's mother alleged that the accused was a victim of the upbringing / harbor against the deceased because the victim wanted to file a criminal case against the accused who committed the mother of the deceased. The property had attempted to steal a calf. At the time of the statement made by the complainant to the Investigating Officer, the accused was not introduced / subjected to the offense but no criminal case was registered in which the complainant or the accused had committed theft against the accused. Had tried, there could not be a question of hatred. The born pillow was allegedly recovered from the location of the victim, which indicates that he had participated fully in the office commission. Neither the complainant identified the accused nor knew their names on the occasion. And he also did not allege that he had seen / seen the characteristics of the accused persons but one of the two persons who arrived at the scene during the incident was not produced in the court of witness while the other in his statement before the police. Made dishonest reforms. Show that he had identified the accused. And if he had identified the accused, he would have named the accused in his statement to the police. Other witnesses also made dishonest improvements, so the FIR of their testimony was not mentioned as the two witnesses who arrived at the scene during the incident.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
