Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH COLLECTOR/DOR DISTRICT CHAKWAL versus BAZ KHAN


Section 42 of the Pakistan42 Constitution Pakistan, Article ? (185 ()), contending that the construction of the road by the defendants on the land owned by the defendants for the claimants, the trial court in favor of the plaintiff. The decision was taken and given a sum of Rs 1 lakh as compensation, which was reduced. Up to Rs 16,000 by the lower appellate court, but the high court restored the amount to Rs 100,000 in exercise of the amended jurisdiction, which was settled by the trial court in 1983 against the plaintiff from his land. Was admitted, no money was paid despite the order of the case. For the last 27 years, the decision passed by the High Court to the plaintiffs was reasonable and the defendants, who were prosecuted on the partisan basis, failed to identify any weakness, legal or factual fact in the judgment passed by the High Court. , Which could justify interference and leave of appeal was denied

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Bisham lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.