Section 8 (2) and (3) Professional Groups and Services (Probation, Training and Sanity) Rules, 1990, R7 (4) Government Employees (Sanity) Rules, 1993, R2 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 212 Change of Service Group The application for an elderly appellant (government employee) was included in the Foreign Service Group in BS 19 a year ago, after which he filed a request to convert his service group to a district management group, The request was processed and allocated. In mid-1994, the appellant requested the relevant authorities to fix his seniority with his batchmates appointed in 1992, whose request was rejected by the authorities and the appellant's service. The tribunal rule was that the government had the authority to grant date dormitory pursuant to section 23 of the Civil Servants Act 1973; that it was treated unfairly as other officers whose group after the change of their original batch of colleagues Was given seniority as well. Rule 7 (4) of the Professional Groups and Services (Probation, Training and Seniority) Rules 1990 will not stand in the way of the appellant as it has been stated that there is an inter-severity principle only within this batch while the appellant claims. I was doing. Sanitary with their original batch colleagues of 1992 Validity rules / regulations related to sanity, including Sections 8 (2) and 8 (3) of the Civil Servants Act 1973, Rule 7 (4) of professional groups and services. Included. Rules of Probation, Training and Seniority (Rules, 1990) and Civil Servants (Serenity) Rules 1993, did not meet the seniority of the previous history of civil servants, but were used by their middle class colleagues.
