Find a Lawyer

OCEAN PAKISTAN LTD. versus FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD

Sections 120, 122 (5A) and (9) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 (3) sale of working interest by the Oil Exploring Company, issuance of showcase notice by the Authority in which the applicant for non-payment of tax The final review is recommended to reopen. The liability for the profits derived from such sales will be decided by the High Court seeking the removal of the constitutional application. The tax classification authority will now decide whether such sale is outside the scope of the contract and the applicable law applicant. Any possible facts and legal objections may be raised to the competent authority, who issued the unwanted notice and sought its explanation; the Supreme Court refused to allow the appeal in the circumstances.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2012

• EHSAN ULLAH v. State 2012 SCMR 1137
• SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER v. M.K. RAFIQ SAHEB 2012 SCMR 1140
• MUHAMMAD FAHIM SOOMRO v. WAQAR AHMED QADRI 2012 PLC(CS) 1144
• PRESS CLIPPING PUBLISHED IN DAILY EXPRESS DATED 14-11-2009 REGARDING ISSUANCE OF CNIC TO HINDU MARRI 2012 SCMR 1147
• AJMAL HASSAN KHAN v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 2012 PLC(CS) 1153
• RAMACHANDRAN v. STATE OF KERALA 2012 SCMR 1156
• PROVINCE OF SINDH v. Syed AFTAB ALI SHAH 2012 PLC(CS) 1165
• ABDUL MAJEED v. SHAUKAT ALI 2012 SCMR 1172

All Supreme Court judgments of 2012 →

immigration advocates email from Pasroor lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes