Section 302 (b) Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 7 and 21 (l) murder, definition of evidence of terrorism act, sentenced the FIR to be reduced immediately Suspicion was dismissed that the complainant consciously or consulted. Before the incident, the parties did not raise questions about the misidentification of the accused before they went to know each other, and nothing was revealed about the purpose of the collateral account; the complainant, the deceased's real brother, and the other The witnesses, who are not from the complaining party, were resigned because the witnesses were resigned because the prosecution defense failed to produce any teeth, or the presence of the prosecution witnesses was ruined. At the time of the incident, the accused and the accompanying accomplice, both at the time of the incident, caught Kalashnikov, while the motorcyclists were riding and the assassin was attacked, resulting in his death, after lifting Lalkaris. As a result, the victim began firing, medical evidence also confirmed the ocular account, beyond the shadow of a long, unknown suspect, the record also proved that there is reasonable doubt that Kalashnikov was aware of his current condition. I was not sent to the Franzic Science Laboratory office to find out if it could be worked or otherwise. No crime was recovered from that location, but it was recovered after a period of about 2 2/2 years. In this case the prosecution proved its case beyond the shadow of reasonable doubt against the accused, but the amount of punishment could be reduced, hence, the prosecution accused
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
