ABRAR-UL-HAQ SHAMI, DEPUTY SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION, ISLAMABAD versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF OVERSEAS PAKISTANIS, ISLAMABAD
Article 185 (3) Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Appeal for leave for appeal Appeals decision to convert such application to Intra Court for leave of appeal by High Court scope petition An appeal was filed against an unclean decision. The High Court through which the petitioners' writ petitions were dismissed said the respondent stated that where the intra-court appeal was rendered by the law against the unapproved decision, the leave application for appeal would not be retained and so it was rejected. Will have to be rejected as the writ petition of the applicant may be rejected. File separate intra-court appeals before the High Court is valid. The first application for leave for appeal (the first application) was filed on the 20th day of the declaration of disqualification and the intra-court appeal will not be out of time, while the second. The appeal for leave (second application) was filed on the 58th day of the declaration of unclean decision and thus the intra-court appeal would be out of time on the applicant's wrongful counsel for leave to appeal for appeal and The second applicant was apparently guilty of a misdemeanor on the basis of misunderstanding, which may be the first applicant's pursuit of remedies against the victims. The decision, although it is not curable, but excluding it and allowing applicants to file intra-court appeals will only be a ministerial task, allowing current applicants to decide intra-court appeals properly. Can be minimized. There is a question as to the extent to be raised in the intra-court appeals by the High Court
