Section Constitution 42, Constitution of Pakistan, Article ? 185 (185) (a) Claiming title for alleged sale of sale, failure to examine minor witnesses, effect of property-related claim based on the order of the Settlement Authorities, The courts did not find such claims under the affected litigation. That the plaintiff (applicant) could not prove his title to the property in view of the fact that he had sold parts of it to some of the defendants (defendants), while the other defendants (defendants) claimed their title. What is it. Claimants claiming to have more than the property on sale by the claimant on the basis of the transfer order (TO) from the settlement authorities claim that the sale has not been proven in the trial case since the legitimate sale. Was not complied with by law, that is, trivial witnesses were not examined to record certified copies only to a party and then to claim that they were proven without the proper procedure of law The sale was never formally challenged by the SEC, meaning it never sought declaration that some of the defendants' claims for the sale were canceled, which were based on the settlement orders. The two courts were never touched at the bottom of the plea that the appeal was changed and allowed for leave, the unclean decisions of both the courts were set aside and the trial trial. Was done in court, where the plaintiff will have the right to edit. Most exclusions are subject to exclusions only
