Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

IBRAHIM versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 (2) Bail police found the accused innocent and the accused in the challan accused Column No.2 was released on bail.

1969 P Cr. L J 111

[Lahore]

Before M. Jamil Asghar, J

IBRAHIM‑Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 5586 of 1968, decided on 19th November 1968.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)-----

S. 497 (2)‑Bail‑Police finding accused innocent and placing hire in column No. 2 of Challan‑Accused released on bail.

Abdul Malik v. State P L D 1968 S C 349 fol.

Kh. A. Waheed for Petitioner.

Mufti Nazar Muhammad for the State.

ORDER

The police found Ibrahim petitioner innocent and placed him in column No. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, urges that the case falls under section 497(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and as such he should be released on bail. The learned counsel for the State, on the other hand, contends that four of the eye‑witnesses before the committing Magistrate inculpate the petitioner and since the offence alleged to have been committed is non‑bailable he should not be released on bail. The learned counsel for the State places reliance on case Abdul Malik v. State (P L D 1968 S C 349) in which also the accused was found innocent by the police and his bail was refused by the High Court, but the Supreme Court allowed bail, observing:

"Similarly where reasonable grounds are not disclosed but grounds do exist for a further investigation and inquiry into the guilt of an accused person, the case will fall under section 497 (2) of the Cr. P. C., in which case again bail should not be withheld."

In view of the above I accept this petition and release the petitioner on bail on his furnishing security in the sum of Rs. 8,000.00 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the S. D. M., Narowal. A copy of this order be given dasti to the petitioner on payment of fee.

Petition accepted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Chowk Munda lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.