Section L Ordinance (CIII of 2002) of 33 listed companies (substantial share of voting shares and take-overs), Sections 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 13, 25 and 26 increase the Company's annual audit accounts for the respective years Companies involved in the company's shareholding list (substantial share of voting shares and tech overs) have been attracted by the ordinance, 2002 company consultant, he said, due to the increase in company shareholding. The company's chief executive had parent shares. Gift and his brother's Consultant of the Company further stated that these were all inter-family transactions / arrangements and there was no ordinary public acquisition or acquisition because the shares in question were transferred to the Company as a gift of the Chief Executive. Has been claimed. During the lifetime of parents, under section 3 (subsection e) of listed companies (substantial share of voting shares and take-over) ordinance, 2002 W ordinance, certain app transactions of section app were filed. Who, under the aforesaid ordinance, could not fall under any of these exempt transactions, had already adopted a soft view on the unpaid order. One lakh rupees on the Appellant, which could have been a maximum fine of one million rupees when the restraining order for imposing a fine was upheld and the appeal was dismissed. \ R \ n
Related judgments — Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan, 2012
