SHAZIA AZEEM versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, QUETTA
Section 10 transferred to the Balochistan Service Tribunals Act (v. 1974), the Section 4 Transfer Appellant, appointed as SST (B16) and posted to the place of ADEO. The appellant alleged that the transfer was a result. The political pressure, which broke the directives and recommendations of letters issued by the Chief Minister, a senator and the provincial minister, respectively, would indicate that this political pressure has come to the fore and the Balochistan Civil Servants Act, 1974 10 under exchange / posting question. , Fall under the jurisdiction of the competent authority, but this discretion should not be exercised in an arbitrary and unreasonable manner; the justice should be bound to the duty required by the principles of justice and justice. There should be no discretion and no matter what the nature of the duties and capabilities required in a fair and impartial manner. If we violate the Extra Exchange Order of Adjustment for Blue Eyed Persons, the scope of the Service Tribunal Enforcement Order will ultimately be waived.
Related judgments — Service Tribunal Balochistan, 2012
