PROFESSOR KAZIM HUSSAIN versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF LAW, JUSTICE AND PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS, ISLAMA
Article 203 D Office Memorandum No. R2 (3) / 03 dated 31 7 2004, Ministry of Housing and Works, F5 (17) / Yards Amp (i) / 73, Dated 20 11 1974 and F2 (1) R5 / 91, dated 25 8 1991, the House of Representatives of the Finance Ministry for Islam House Rent Allowance for husband and wife was a civil servant, and his complaint was that when both husband and wife were public servants, they both moved to the house. Houses were rented. And not only was marriage unacceptable with either of the two, nor was it a crime, and for that reason, a civil servant should not be punished or deprived of his house after marriage, even though both spouses. Consumers are entitled to allowance, even if they were working at the same station and in one place, and the same logic applies to the rent of a house, as well as to a spouse who was a civil servant in the office memorandum / rule. One of them was deprived of a government housing allowance for a rent allowance. In accordance with Article 203 D (3) of the Constitution, Islam directed the independent government and related authorities, including the federal government, as well as the provincial governments and universities of Punjab, Sindh, Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. To take necessary steps for amending the office memorandum / rules so that the consolidation of Islam will be agreed and the petition is allowed accordingly.
