Find a Lawyer

SULTAN MEHMOOD versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, BHAKKAR

Article Constitution 76 Constitution of Pakistan, Article Constitution 199 Constitution Constitutional petition Secondary evidence The lack of a permit document, the need for the preparation of lost documents was denied the validity of the presence of secondary evidence, its execution and origin Damage to the document was inevitable, especially where it was implemented. The other document was rejected by the applicants without presenting irrelevant evidence and demanded the preparation of the documents with the permission of the court, which the court rejected, the constitutional application was dismissed.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015

• PAKISTAN CHIPBOARD (PVT.) LTD. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Revenue Division 2015 PTD 1520
• Syeda ABIDA HUSSAIN IMAM v. The PROVINCE OF PUNJAB 2015 YLR 1522
• Malik HABIB ULLAH v. LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2015 YLR 1542
• ATTA MUHAMMAD v. State 2015 YLR 1558
• MUHAMMAD AMIR v. State 2015 YLR 1582
• WAPDA through Chairman v. KHALID PERVAIZ 2015 YLR 1598
• Hafiz NAZIR AHMED v. ZAIN UL ABIDEEN 2015 YLR 1606
• ZAHEER AHMAD BABAR v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE 2015 YLR 1617

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2015 →

jobs for fresh advocates from Manoabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes